Covid Vaccine Injuries, [28.09.21 23:18]

[Forwarded from Natural News]

UK hospital data shocks the world: 80% of COVID deaths are among the vaccinated… COVID deaths up 3,000% after vaccine wave

A deadly combination of science fraud, institutional coercion, bribery, Big Tech censorship, government force and media propaganda are bringing the world to its knees. There is NO real-world data showing that covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. Right now, hospital data from the United Kingdom is shocking the world, providing serious evidence of vaccine failure and vaccine-induced death. In the UK, up to 80 percent of COVID deaths are currently coming from vaccinated people. COVID deaths across the UK are now 3,000 percent more frequent than they were at the same time a year ago, when the population was “unvaccinated.”

For over a year, vaccine efficacy was tirelessly promoted, even though absolute risk reduction for all the COVID vaccines on the market was less than two percent, a meaningless number. To make matters worse, the vaccines are increasing the rate of iatrogenic death and making more people susceptible to severe respiratory disease, priming human cells for antibody dependent enhancement.

UK Public Health mortality data shocks the world

The UK’s Yellow Card Scheme, a vaccine injury and medical error surveillance system, shows a clear pattern of vaccine failure. COVID vaccines are increasing hospitalization and death for people who could have easily gone on with their lives, healthy and VAX-free. Instead of being coerced into risky, compounding vaccine experiments, thousands of sick and dying people could have faced a potential infection and recovered with durable, natural immunity.

UK hospital data shows that covid-19 deaths are 3,000 percent higher now compared to this time last year, and it’s not the “unvaccinated” who are dying in greater numbers. The latest data from Public Health England shows just how dangerous vaccine worship and coercion is. From February 1, 2021 to September 12, 2021, the unvaccinated represented just 28 percent of the covid fatalities while the vaccinated represented 72 percent of the deaths!

Public Health Scotland confirms the same pattern of vaccine failure. From August 14, 2020 to September 12, 2020, Scotland recorded just seven covid-19 fatalities. After coercing a large portion of the population to take the covid vaccines, Scotland recorded 222 covid-19 deaths just a year later, during that same period of time. This covid-19 death spike is 3,071.4% higher after a mass vaccination campaign. Most shocking of all: 80 percent of these deaths are occurring in the vaccinated.

Vaccine’s purported 95% efficacy is a total fraud in the real world, actually increases risk of death

Even though the unvaccinated are coerced to test more frequently for travel, education and work, their numbers are still similar to the “fully vaccinated.” The data shows that COVID cases are relatively equal among the vaccinated and unvaccinated. From August 21, to September 17, 2021, there were 69,639 positive cases recorded among the unvaccinated population, and 79,613 cases among the vaccinated population, with 60,923 of these cases deriving from the “fully vaccinated.” Clearly, the vaccine doesn’t prevent COVID, and may even be a driving force for new infections in the unvaccinated.

Most shocking, the rate of death is not 95 percent lower in the vaccinated group. From August 14 to September 10, 2021, Scotland registered 208 covid-19 deaths. There were 41 deaths in the unvaccinated, 9 deaths in the partially vaccinated, and a shocking 158 deaths in the fully vaccinated. If the 95 percent efficacy of the vaccine was real, then 95 percent of the deaths would occur in the unvaccinated and only 5 percent would be in the vaccinated. However, up to 80 percent of the deaths are in the vaccinated and only 20 percent of the deaths are in the unvaccinated. The vaccines are currently INCREASING the risk of death in the UK by 400%!

Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

Shocking New Study Suggests COVID-19 Vaccination Alone Won't Stop Variants and Could Actually Make It Worse

📝💉@COVID19Up: Vaccination alone won't stop the rise of new SARS-CoV-2 variants and in fact could push the evolution of strains that evade their protection, scientists warned Friday in a new study published (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3) in Nature Scientific Reports.

"Vaccines are thought to be the best available solution for controlling the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the emergence of vaccine-resistant strains may come too rapidly for current vaccine developments to alleviate the health, economic and social consequences of the pandemic," the authors wrote.

"When most people are vaccinated, the vaccine-resistant strain has an advantage over the original strain," Simon Rella of the Institute of Science and Technology Austria, who worked on the study, told reporters.

"This means the vaccine resistant strain spreads through the population faster at a time when most people are vaccinated."

Surprisingly, CNN reported (https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/30/health/vaccination-alone-variants-study/index.html) on the new study, saying the findings support an "unpopular decision" this week by the CDC to advise even fully vaccinated people to start wearing masks again until "almost everyone in a population has been vaccinated." 

Unfortunately, since May 14 the CDC has only reported (https://t.me/COVID19Up/9992) SARS-CoV-2 infections among vaccinated people that resulted in hospitalization or death, removing the majority of breakthrough cases from COVID-19 case data. In the past six months, the US sequenced  (https://covidcg.org/?tab=global_sequencing)and shared results for only 4.1% of all positive tests, far less than most other countries.

All of this raises serious questions in context with the CDC finally recognizing that fully vaccinated people are spreading the Delta variant and suddenly advising (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/28/health/cdc-covid-testing-vaccine.html) that vaccinated people be tested for SARS-CoV-2 if they come into contact with someone who has COVID-19. Previously, the agency only recommended that the vaccinated people get tested when they are experiencing COVID-19 symptoms.

......................................................................................

In her public confessions this week, CDC director Walensky also admitted that covid is “just a few mutations away” from rendering all existing vaccines completely obsolete. She added:

The largest concern that I think we in public health and science are worried about is that virus and the potential mutations. We have a very transmissible virus, which has the potential to evade our vaccines in terms of how it protects us from severe disease and death…

[...]

Also,  confirmation coming from  vaccine scientist Geert vanden Bossche:

…[M]ass vaccination promotes natural selection of increasingly vaccine immunity (VI)-escaping variants in the vaccinated part of the population. Taken together, mass vaccination conducted on a background of high infectivity rates enables more infectious, increasingly VI-escaping variants to expand in prevalence. This evolution inevitably results in inclining morbidity rates in both, the non-vaccinated and vaccinated population and precipitates the emergence of circulating viral variants that will eventually fully resist vaccine-mediated immunity (VMI). This is why mass vaccination campaigns should not be conducted during a pandemic of a highly mutable virus, let alone during a pandemic of more infectious variants (unless transmission-blocking vaccines are used!). It is critical to understand that a rapid decline in viral infectivity rates that is not achieved by natural infection but merely results from expedited mass vaccination campaigns will only delay abrupt propagation of emerging, fully vaccine-resistant viral variants and hence, only delay the occurrence of a high wave of morbidity and mortality.

[...] Another confirmation from the inventor of the mRNA vaccines, dr. Robert Malone ( The Vaccine Causes The Virus To Be More Dangerous - July 2021):

 "In a recent interview with Steve Bannon on War Room Pandemic, Dr. Malone (who is fully pro-vaccine, by the way), stated:

This is exactly what you would see if antibody dependent enhancement were happening… Pfizer protection is waning at six months. Those who received Pfizer, that are now in the waning phase, seem to be getting infected. This exactly what you would anticipate is the window of greatest susceptibility to antibody dependent enhancement, in this long tapering phase as the vaccine response declines.

The government is obfuscating what’s happening here. What seems to be rolling out the worst case scenario where the vaccine in the waning phase is causing virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise, which is what we call ADE."

• In the U.K., symptomatic COVID-19 cases among “vaccinated” individuals have risen 40% in one week, reaching an average rate of 15,537 new infections a day being detected. Meanwhile, symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the unvaccinated has declined by 22% and is now at a current daily average of 17,588
• This suggests the wave among unvaccinated has peaked and that natural herd immunity has set in, while “vaccinated” individuals are actually becoming more prone to infection
• Data show countries with the highest COVID injection rates are also experiencing the greatest upsurges in cases, while countries with the lowest injection rates have the lowest caseloads
• 100 fully injected crew members had tested positive onboard the British Defense aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. The Navy ship has a case rate of 1 in 16 — the highest case rate recorded. This suggests vaccine-induced herd immunity is impossible, as these injections apparently cannot prevent COVID-19 even if 100% of a given population gets them
• It is mathematically impossible for COVID shots to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 infection. The four available COVID shots in the U.S. provide an absolute risk reduction between just 0.7% and 1.3%. Meanwhile, the noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio across age groups is a mere 0.26%. Since the absolute risk that needs to be overcome is lower than the absolute risk reduction these injections can provide, mass vaccination simply cannot have a favorable impact

ISRAEL SHOCKING REPORT (August 2021)

"95% of the severe patients are vaccinated".

"85-90% of the hospitalizations are in Fully vaccinated people."

"We are opening more and more COVID wards."

"The effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out"

(Dr. Kobi Haviv, earlier today on Chanel 13 @newsisrael13)

https://twitter.com/RanIsraeli/status/1423322271503028228

see also:  Most Covid patients at Israeli hospital fully vaccinated? What does this mean for Australia? (Aug 2021)

"Deputy Director for Infectious Diseases Jay Butler told reporters that current data shows the risk of developing both rare and common side effects after the COVID-19 shot was higher after the second dose. 

"We're keenly interested in knowing whether or not a third dose may be associated with any higher risk of adverse reactions, particularly some of those more severe – although very rare – side effects," he said during a briefing."

World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor Christian Perronne yesterday said that all vaccinated people must quarantine over the winter months or risk serious illness.

Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chairman of the Specialized Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health.

Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: “Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from the society.”

He went on to say: “Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It’s proven in Israel now – I’m in contact with many physicians in Israel – they’re having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems.”

The current working group on the COVID-19 pandemic in France was reported to be “utterly panicked” on receipt of the news, fearing pandemonium if it follows the guidance of the experts.

Israeli doctor Kobi Haviv told Channel 13 News: “95% of seriously ill patients are vaccinated. Fully vaccinated people account for 85-90% of hospitalizations. We are opening more and more COVID branches. The effectiveness of vaccines is declining or disappearing.”

 August 2021: LifeSite hosted a townhall conference with The Truth For Health Foundation, “Stop the Shot… The Rest of the Story.” This online meeting will feature Dr. Peter McCullough, Attorney Thomas Renz, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Sister Deidre Byrne, Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, Dr. Jose Trasancos, and other prominent physicians, scientists, attorneys, and religious leaders who will be discussing vital information related to the COVID jab, clinical trials, and more.

Here’s a brief look at what was shared at this online meeting:

• Breaking information will be shared by the lead attorney in U.S. suit against the Biden regime’s HHS regarding VAERS, adverse events, under-reporting deaths, and injuries. This presentation will also include an update on the CDC Whistleblower affidavit, which indicates more than 45,000 actual deaths have taken place following the COVID shot, versus the VAERS reports of only 11,000.
• Previously undisclosed data from both Pharma-clinical trials and subsequent additional studies on the COVID jab related to specific, serious, immediate, and long-term impacts on fertility in both men and women.
• Updates on international medical studies regarding actual vaccine immunity versus what has been reported to the public by the media.
• Breaking information regarding international lawsuits and theological implications related to the latest COVID news around the world.

See also:

• part II ‘Stop the Shot’ Part II: Fertility Risks https://www.lifesitenews.com/conference-stop-the-shot/stop-the-shot-part-3/
  part III ‘Stop The Shot’ Part III: Vaccine Injuries & FDA ‘Approval’ https://www.lifesitenews.com/conference-stop-the-shot/stop-the-shot-part-3/
  
• and ‘The Nuremberg Code has been violated’: Prominent medical expert blasts FDAs approval of Pfizer COVID jab (by dr. Paul Alexander, A former adviser to COVID Pandemic policy for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) ) https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/the-nuremberg-code-has-been-violated-prominent-medical-expert-blasts-fdas-approval-of-pfizer-covid-jab/  (see also   Trump HHS COVID Advisor Drops BOMBS! Task Force Mislead POTUS, No “Pandemic”)

The Head Of Operation Warp Speed & The Gates Foundation Are Pushing BioElectronics & Vaccine Patches (22 Oct 2020)

(Warpspeed Chief  Dr. Moncef Slaoui, a former executive with vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline ) 

Slaoui is currently partner at MediciX investment firm, chairman of the board at Galvani Bioelectronics, chairman of the board at SutroVax and sits on the boards of Artisan Biosciences, Human Vaccines Project and the aforementioned Moderna Therapeutics. 

Galvani Bioelectronics was formed out of an agreement with Verily Life Sciences LLC (formerly Google Life Sciences), an Alphabet company, and GSK. The goal is to “enable the research, development and commercialisation of bioelectronic medicines.” Bioelectronic medicine is a relatively new research field focused on tackling chronic diseases by using “miniaturised, implantable devices that can modify electrical signals that pass along nerves in the body, including irregular or altered impulses that occur in many illnesses”. GSK has been active in this field since 2012 and has stated that chronic conditions such as arthritis, diabetes and asthma could potentially be treated using these devices.

Researchers Warn Some Covid-19 Vaccines Could Increase Risk Of HIV Infection (Forbes20.10.2020)

" Ad5 is used as a vector in some Covid-19 vaccines —  Science identifies four such candidates that are currently undergoing clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the U.S., with two in large scale phase 3 trials ongoing in Russia and Pakistan. 

The researchers stressed the need to understand the role Ad5 might play in increasing the risks of HIV in vulnerable populations before developing and deploying vaccines using the vector, adding that informed consent documents should reflect the “considerable literature” on the risk of HIV acquisition with Ad5 vectors. "

How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System (dr. J. Mercola, 11.09.2020)

• According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants, disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they’re exposed to the virus
• Previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — including those for SARS, MERS and RSV — have revealed a serious concern: The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)
• ADE means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated
• Lethal Th2 immunopathology is another potential risk. A faulty T cell response can trigger allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes can activate the complement system, resulting in airway damage
• There’s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and would need the vaccine the most — are also the most vulnerable to ADE and Th2 immunopathology"

Emma Wall, PhD, the lead study author and an infectious diseases specialist at the Francis Crick Institute in London(Dr. David Bauer is also on this team), said in a statement.”

“The most important thing is to ensure that vaccine protection remains high enough to keep as many people out of hospital as possible,” she said. “And our results suggest that the best way to do this is to quickly deliver second doses and provide boosters to those whose immunity may not be high enough against these new variants.”
The research team analyzed antibodies in the blood of 250 healthy people, ages 33-52, up to 3 months after receiving their first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The team looked for “neutralizing antibodies,” or the ability of antibodies to block the virus from entering cells.
The researchers tested five variants: the original strain discovered in China, the dominant strain in Europe during the first wave in April 2020, the B.1.1.7 variant discovered in the U.K., the B.1.351 variant first seen in South Africa, and the newest variant of concern, which is the B.1.617.2 variant discovered in India.
The team compared the concentrations of the neutralizing antibodies among the variants. They found that people who had been fully vaccinated with two Pfizer doses had antibodies that were 6 times lower against the B.1.617.2 variant, 5 times lower against the B.1.351 variant, and 2.6 times lower against the B.1.1.7 variant when compared to the original strain.
The antibody response was even lower in people who had received only one dose. After a single Pfizer dose, 79% of people had neutralizing antibodies against the original strain, which fell to 50% for the B.1.1.7 variant, 32% for the B.1.617.2 variant, and 25% for the B.1.351 variant.”Source

Dr. David L.V. Bauer:" So the key message from our findings is that we found that recipients of the Pfizer vaccine -Those who’ve had two doses, have about 5 to 6 fold lower amounts of neutralizing antibodies. Now these are the sort of ‘Gold Standard’, ‘private security’ ahh antibodies of your immune system – which blocks the virus from getting into your cells in the first place. ”

So we found that that’s less with people with two doses and we also found that with people with only one dose of the Pfizer jab, that they are less likely to have high levels of  these antibodies in their blood. And perhaps most importantly for all of us going forward, is that we see that the older you are ,  the lower your levels are likely to be, and the time since you’ve had your second jab, as that time goes on, the lower your levels are also likely to be. So that’s telling us we’re probably going to be beginning to prioritize boosters for all  older and more vulnerable people coming up soon, especially as this new variant spreads.”"

( Dr David Bauer tells the world Pfizer vaccine gives low immunity - JUly 2021) (see also video below)

 The prestigious Salk Institute, founded by vaccine pioneer Jonas Salk, has authored and published a bombshell scientific article revealing that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is what’s actually causing vascular damage in covid patients and covid vaccine recipients, promoting the strokes, heart attacks, migraines, blood clots and other harmful reactions that have already killed thousands of Americans (source: VAERS.hhs.gov). 

 The double vaccinated have 5.5 times more chances to die of the so-called Delta variant than the unvaccinated?  This is simply Public Health England data... OFFICIAL: 

"The above table shows that of the 121,402 alleged cases of the Delta variant in people who are unvaccinated, just 165 have sadly died. This translates to 0.1% of cases.The above table also shows that of the 28,773 alleged cases of the Delta Covid variant in people who are fully vaccinated, 224 people sadly died. This translates to 0.8% of cases. The means the data published by Public Health England shows us that people who have received two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine have a 507% higher chance of dying due to the Delta Covid variant than people who are unvaccinated. [...]  The manufacturers, scientists, the government, and health authorities claim the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of dying with Covid-19 by around 95 – 99%. The data shows this to be a lie. " 

"From the 26th June to the 23rd July 2021, PHS claim that 38,067 positive cases of Covid-19 were confirmed in the unvaccinated population. However within the same time frame just 15,485 positive cases of Covid-19 were confirmed in the fully vaccinated population.

However, of the unvaccinated population, 863 people have been hospitalised in the same time frame. Whereas of the fully vaccinated population, 763 people have been hospitalised in the same time frame.

This means that just 2.3% of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated population have resulted in hospitalisation. Whereas 5% of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the fully vaccinated population have resulted in hospitalisation. "

"The IPC’s April report warns that being injected with the Pfizer vaccine could lead to catastrophic health issues, which has been evidenced by the countless Israeli lives that have been damaged by the jab.

The report states: “Never has a vaccine injured so many! We recived 288 reports of deaths occuring in proximity to the vaccination (90% up to 10 days after the vaccination). 64% are men.”

However, Israel’s Ministry of Health’s figures claims that only 45 deaths occurred in proximity to vaccination. As the report states, this “smokescreen”, lack of transparency and deception only leads to more deaths."

  Questions to and answers from authorities regarding the flu vaccine in the context of the pandemic  

 Proof of that Covid19 Vaccine will be effective (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 4 Nov 2020  

AstraZeneca vaccine AZD1222 will it prevent a covid19 infection (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 28 Oct 2020 

See also VACCINATION PAGE   / FLU VACCINE PAGE 

THE NUREMBERG CODE aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are: 

• Voluntary consent is essential
• The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society
• Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation
• Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury
• No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
• The risks should never exceed the benefits
• Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects
• Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists
• Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time
• The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur

The Charter of Patient Rights and Responsibilities from NHS SCOTLANDstipulates at page 13:"You have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test or screening procedure that is offered to you. - If you can understand the information you are given and are capable of making a decision for yourself about the care or treatment you are offered, then you have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test, or screening procedure, or to take part in research."  - Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine: AN example of how academics justify mandatory vaccination as compatible with  human rights (ECHT) - Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*, Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220) - Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law(no mention to vaccination risks or the disputable ethic of the vaccine producing corporations - see  Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary - Ex:  AstraZeneca,  Sanofi,  Pfizer  )  

  Kevin Corbett & Kate Shemirani : GENOCIDE NOTICE addressed to  Vicky Ford MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Children and Families and to  Matt HancockDear Under Secretary,We are writing to you with regard to the planned Covid-19 vaccination program.We wish to draw your attention to the expected high number of adverse reactions which the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) explicitly state are a “direct threat to patient life and public health”:“For reasons of extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine MHRA have accelerated the sourcing and implementation of a vaccine specific AI tool.Strictly necessary — it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of Adverse Drug Reactions [ADRs] that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch.”https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0We, as health care professionals having a combined experience in excess of seventy years, with extensive knowledge of the history of vaccines, vaccine ingredients and their side-effects, are deeply concerned about the MHRA’s expected morbidity and mortality in vaccine recipients.We therefore hereby inform you that if the planned vaccination program shall proceed then you will be directly culpable for the infant mortality and damage caused to children for whom you and the local authorities you oversee are responsible. [...]  Hundreds of NHS staff form anti-vax group and label new Covid jabs 'poison  "NHS and care home staff in their hundreds have formed a group opposed to vaccinations, wearing masks and testing in hospitals.The 250 plus-member strong group, NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine, includes a GP, several A&E nurses, healthcare assistants, lab workers, and care home staff."-  NHS workers for choice, no restrictions for declining a vaccine.  (FB Group)   Message from the Pr. PERRONNE on vaccines! (FB, Dec 2020)Dear friends,France, which has been having a nightmare for months, is waking up. In many cities in our beautiful country, the people are on the move to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy.As a doctor, infectious disease specialist and having served as president of many public health bodies or advice, including vaccines, I measure daily the uncertainties that generate fear and increasing disarray of our fellow citizens. I take the risk of being called a ′′ conspiracy ′′ or better a ′′ reassurist ", terms referring to those who criticize or challenge the unique thought.I end up being proud of these names, my words expressing the truth have never changed since the epidemic began. So I consider it my responsibility to express myself again today on the whole medical aspect of Covid-19 and especially on the subject of vaccination, now the central and almost unique element of health policy in the state.Many French people have been mesmerized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we had been told a terrible second wave of the epidemic, worse than the first. The Minister of Health, Dr. Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Elysee, Professor Jean Fran ançois Delfraissy, the Director General of Health, Professor Jerome Solomon, the Pasteur Institute have announced catastrophic numbers with an exponential increase in the death toll. Hospitals needed to be saturated and overwhelmed.Even the President of the Republic, during a recent TV address announcing reconfinement, predicted no less than 400.000 deaths, falling out of the 200.000 Estimated dead shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet of Pastor.These unrealistic numbers had only one goal, to maintain fear to make us stay confined, wisely masked. Yet the widespread use of masks in general population has no scientific interest in stopping the SARS-COV-2. epidemic.The use of masks should be targeted to the sick, their surroundings (especially at-risk) and carers on contact.The epidemic is regressing and has not led to any apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve have been showing for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is seen with certain viruses, once the epidemic wave is over.This reflects the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the collective immunity that is progressing in the population and protecting us naturally.The virus strains currently circulating have lost their virulence. Authorities won't be able to say it's because the downward trend had started even before it was put in place.The regression of the epidemic had even begun, in some agglomerations, before curfew was introduced.Unfortunately, there are still deaths that happen in very elderly, big obese or people with severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, already disabling cardiorespiratory or kidney diseases.These people at risk are perfectly identified. Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect, screen and treat them as soon as possible with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin symptoms which are widely confirmed with the efficacy and safety if given early treatment.Many deaths could have been prevented. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been deterred from treating.In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind useless masks remains incomprehensible. All these measures are taken to ensure that the French are demanding a vaccine. What's the point of a widespread vaccine for a disease with nearly 0,05 % mortality? None. This mass vaccination is pointless. Also, the risks of vaccination can be greater than the benefits.The most disturbing part is that many countries, including France, are saying they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, as the development and evaluation of these products went fast and no result of the effectiveness or the danger of these vaccines has not been published to date.We only had the right to press releases from the industrial manufacturers, allowing their stock exchanges to flame.The worst part is that the first ′′ vaccines ′′ we are offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products.We're going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to make virus elements.The consequences of this injection are absolutely unknown because it is a first in humans. What if some ′′ vaccinated ′′ cells made too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our bodies?The first gene therapies will be at RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is from DNA to RNA, but the opposite is possible in certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have contained so-called ′′ endogenous ′′ retroviruses integrated into our DNA since the beginning of the night. chromosomes.These ′′ domesticated ′′ retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, AIDS retrovirus for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards, from RNA to DNA.Thus an RNA that is foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for equally foreign DNA that can fit into our chromosomes.So there is a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our ova or sperm, to pass these genetic modifications on to our children.People who promote these gene therapies, falsely called ′′ vaccines ′′ are wizard apprentices and take the French and more generally world citizens, for guinea pigs.We don't want to become, like tomatoes or the but transgenic GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical officer of one of the pharmaceutical laboratories manufacturers said a few days ago that he hopes for a personal protective effect, but that it shouldn't be too hopeful for an impact on the transmission of the virus, so on the dynamics of the epidemic.This is a confession in disguise that it is not a vaccine. A fill.I'm all the more horrified that I've always been in favour of vaccines and have presided over over immunization policy bodies for years.Today, stop this extremely disturbing plan. Louis Pastor must turn around in his grave. Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must take over.    Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition (1 Dec 2020) Some great disclosures follow:

• "The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
• The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
• The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
• The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020."

The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon (containing a scientific critic of the PCR test) can be found hereAn Excerpt from  this petition concerning the issue of coronavirus vaccines: VIII. For a vaccine to work, our immune system needs to be stimulated to produce a neutralizing antibody, as opposed to a non-neutralizing antibody. A neutralizing antibody is one that can recognize and bind to some region (‘epitope’) of the virus, and that subsequently results in the virus either not entering or replicating in your cells. A non-neutralizing antibody is one that can bind to the virus, but for some reason, the antibody fails to neutralize the infectivity of the virus. In some viruses, if a person harbors a non-neutralizing antibody to the virus, a subsequent infection by the virus can cause that person to elicit a more severe reaction to the virus due to the presence of the non-neutralizing antibody. This is not true for all viruses, only particular ones. This is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), and is a common problem with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, and the family of coronaviruses. In fact, this problem of ADE is a major reason why many previous vaccine trials for other coronaviruses failed. Major safety concerns were observed in animal models. If ADE occurs in an individual, their response to the virus can be worse than their response if they had never developed an antibody in the first place. This can cause a hyperinflammatory response, a cytokine storm, and a generally dysregulation of the immune system that allows the virus to cause more damage to our lungs and other organs of our body. In addition, new cell types throughout our body are now susceptible to viral infection due to the additional viral entry pathway. There are many studies that demonstrate that ADE is a persistent problem with coronaviruses in general, and in particular, with SARS-related viruses. ADE has proven to be a serious challenge with coronavirus vaccines, and this is the primary reason many of such vaccines have failed in early in-vitro or animal trials. For example, rhesus macaques who were vaccinated with the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV virus demonstrated severe acute lung injury when challenged with SARS-CoV, while monkeys who were not vaccinated did not. Similarly, mice who were immunized with one of four different SARS-CoV vaccines showed histopathological changes in the lungs with eosinophil infiltration after being challenged with   SARS-CoV virus. IX. There are some concerning issues with the trial designs, spelled out by Dr. Peter Doshi in the British Medical Journal. Dr. Doshi focuses on the two biggest issues. First, none of the leading vaccine candidate trials is designed to test if the vaccine can reduce severe COVID-19 symptoms, defined as: hospital admissions, ICU or death. And, second, the trials are not designed to test if the vaccine can interrupt transmission (https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/371/bmj.m4037.full.pdf). If neither of these conditions is met, the vaccine in essence performs like a therapeutic drug, except a vaccine would be taken prophylactically, even by the perfectly healthy, and more than likely carries a higher risk of injury than a therapeutic drug. If this were to be true, then therapeutic drugs would be superior to any COVID vaccine. X. In the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine candidate, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is found in the fatty lipid nanoparticle coating around the mRNA. Seventy percent of people make antibodies to PEG and most do not know it, creating a concerning situation where many could have allergic, potentially deadly, reactions to a PEG-containing vaccine. PEG antibodies may also reduce vaccine effectiveness. Pfizer/BioNTech is also inserting an ingredient derived from a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, into its vaccine. The ingredient has bioluminescent qualities, making it attractive for medical imaging purposes, but it is unclear why an injected vaccine would need to have that quality. mNeonGreen has unknown antigenicity. XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019 - against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. XII. It appears that Pfizer/BioNTech have not yet released any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, instructions/information patients/subjects were given regarding ADE and PEG-related issues and (potential) fertility- or pregnancy-specific issues.     A few common-sense observations in regards to the Pfizer vaccine as presented on the governments' website: • Vaccine may possibly interfere with other medication or vaccines and could affect the reproductive system, pregnancy and breast feeding.  “No data are available about concomitant use of immunosuppressants” (N.B.: that are commonly used to treat autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Chron’s disease, multiple sclerosis atc) “Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction : No interaction studies have been performed. Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not been studied (see section 5.1)” “Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.” “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.” “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility” "Animal studies into potential toxicity to reproduction and development have not been completed."  (*)  See also:  Freeze Sperm Before COVID Vaccine To Protect Fertility – Says University of Miami Researchers• The vaccine’s safety in the case of immune-compromised people or people who already had covid-19 is unknown. The vaccine is still in an experimental phase. Safety and efficacy on a long term (more than 2 months) are unknown. The 2 tests for safety and efficacy comprised 60 participants in the first and 44,000 in the second; In the second, less than half of them, 19.067 have been evaluated for safety and only 2 months after the second dose of the vaccine. The study “excluded participants who were immunocompromised and those who had previous clinical or microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.” However, the most immunocompromised categories of population the elderly, especially those in care homes, are to be the first recipients of it. “Participants are planned to be followed for up to 24 months, for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19 disease.” This means again, that this vaccine is clearly in an experimental phase. This is clearly admitted, as its efficacy is not certain: 2The vaccine elicits both neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses to the spike (S) antigen, which may contribute to protection against COVID-19 disease.”   • The only assurance of safety we get is that “non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on a CONVENTIONAL STUDY OF REPEAT DOSE TOXICITY No details are given about this study that should involve the use of animals, but we found out that “repeated dose toxicity comprises the adverse general toxicological effects occurring as a result of repeated daily exposure dose to a substance for a specified period up to the expected lifespan of the test species” (https://ec.europa.eu/.../validated.../repeated-dose-toxicity or https://www.chemsafetypro.com/.../Repeated_Dose_Toxicity...) As seen in the definition and associated list of tests (oral, dermal, inhalation and chronic) – such could hardly be applied to a vaccine   See also: 

• The same old Vaccine Damage scheme (tax payers money) will be used to pay the damages done by the covid vaccine.  This, of course, in case YOU CAN PROVE, the vaccine was the cause. The residents in care homes, the disabled and institutionalized, the ones lacking capacity or means will never be able to PROVE it. And anyway,  let's remember that OFFICIALLY, the two ladies that ended with transverse myelitis after the second dose of Astrazeneca's covid vaccine, have not been injured by the vaccine, the young Brasilian doctor who was in an Oxford vaccine trial and died, took the placebo, the more than 100 of people from South Korea who died after having the flu shot had other causes of death... Yes, the sum is £120,000... which even if you get it, will never bring back your health, your job, your happiness, your plans for the future, will never change you back from being a burden to being a support to your family. - Britain to cover COVID-19 vaccine side-effects under damages scheme FOLLOW-Up to the 2 transverse myelitis cases: -  AstraZeneca, Under Fire for Vaccine Safety, Releases Trial Blueprints (19 Sept. 2020) - see their trial study hereExperts are concerned that the company has not been more forthcoming about two participants who became seriously ill after getting its experimental vaccine. "The vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca, which formed a partnership with Oxford University scientists, uses a virus meant to carry coronavirus genes into human cells and trigger an immune response that will protect people from the coronavirus. This so-called vector is a modified form of an adenovirus that causes common colds in chimpanzees but is considered safe for people. Several other companies, including Johnson & Johnson and CanSino, are pursuing similar adenovirus-based approaches, although there are multiple types of adenoviruses, and specific ingredients differ from vaccine to vaccine.While other adenovirus-based products have seen some success in the past, they have also been linked to serious adverse events. The most famous was the case of 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger, who died in 1999 after receiving gene therapy through an adenovirus that sparked a lethal inflammatory response from his immune system.If a serious side effect was definitively linked to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, scientists would need to determine if its root cause stemmed from the adenovirus vector, or perhaps the coronavirus genes it carried — connections that could raise concerns about other companies’ products that rely on the same components."  LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF A CHILDREN'S NEWSPAPER RE: VACCINE PROPAGANDADear Editor,I subscribe to your newspaper on behalf of my children, aged _ and _. They are avid readers and very much enjoy having their own newspaper, greatly looking forward to its arrival each week.I am ordinarily very happy with the standard of journalism and the age-appropriate articles included, which prompt much interesting and lively discussion amongst the family.However, I am afraid that the high standards from your newspaper I have come to expect were severely diminished with your [date] issue, which included an article I can only describe as sinister state propaganda. The title of this article was 'New Laws Against Anti-Vaxxers?', and instructed children that engaging any concerns about fast-tracked, unlicensed, and experimental medical products equates to "dangerous nonsense".I am an active campaigner and researcher in the field of children's medical safety, and I know very well that vaccines - like all medical products - come with an array of potential risks and side-effects, some of them severe. This is even so for vaccines that have spent many years or decades in development and that have passed through all the conventional approvals processes, so it is certainly also the case for vaccines that have been produced within a matter of months, and that contain experimental technologies never before utilised on human beings.Many eminent and entirely "pro-vaccine" authorities have issued stark warnings against these vaccines, including Dr. Peter Hotez (1) and UK scientist Hilda Bastian (2).To dismiss these and other entirely credible, important, and worthy concerns as "dangerous nonsense" is dangerous nonsense in itself. There is a huge and imperatively important debate that must happen around these vaccines, where scientists and lay people alike are free to ask questions, demand evidence, and express concerns, without being vilified or silenced by the press. This is especially true for media vehicles that are aimed at the highly impressionable minds of children.Further, I do not appreciate you encouraging children to label and discriminate against others for their beliefs by the inclusion of the slur "anti-vaxxer", a term which has become a denigrating and pejorative taunt meant to imply someone is unreasonable, delusional, or even dangerous. Expressing concerns about fast-tracked, experimental medical products is certainly not unreasonable or dangerous, and nor is it "anti" anything. Rather, it is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability, characteristics which recent history reveals the pharmaceutical companies that produce vaccines tend to be rather lacking in. The company Pfizer, that is producing the vaccine shortly to make its debut in the UK, was, in 2009, fined $2.3 billion to settle civil and criminal allegations that it had illegally marketed its painkiller Bextra, which has been withdrawn. This is the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind ever (3). To not rigorously question a company with such a history when it is producing a fast-tracked product aimed at our most vulnerable citizens is not just slightly remiss, it may border on criminal negligence.I am bringing up my children to be open-minded critical thinkers, and I do not wish them to be recipients of emotive and misleading propaganda dressed up as respectable journalism. Why the UK Government wishes to silence and even criminalise perfectly reasonable debates on medical safety is a question any diligent journalist ought to be extremely interested in exploring, rather than simply parroting state dogma.If you wish to retain my custom, I expect you to resolve this matter in a subsequent issue by posting a balanced and evidence-based piece regarding both the risks and benefits of vaccinations, and underlining the critical importance of preserving people's sovereign rights - including children's - to ask questions.After all, isn't that what journalism is supposed to be all about?Yours sincerely,[Name]References:1) https://uk.reuters.com/.../as-pressure-for-coronavirus... 2) https://www.wired.com/.../the-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine.../ 3) https://www.theguardian.com/.../pfizer-drugs-us-criminal...-------------- Find this letter permanently at: https://miriaf.webs.com/propaganda-children-vaccines   EXTRAORDINARY IMPORTANT REVELATION COMING FROM VACCINE DEVELOPPER:Public_health_emergency_of_international_concert_Geert_Vanden_Bossche.01 Excerpt: ". In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or sacrifice your innate immune defense!). Because natural Abs and innate immune cells recognize a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e., non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges. By keeping the innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential. It has, for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other, quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection, although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more infectious variants). Suppression of innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become very problematic. There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained. As if this was not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY. The more extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups. This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specifc Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. If the virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and ensuring its own propagation. Selecting targeted mutaitons in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense. But in the meantime, we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised with the vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic). The more variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will protect. Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposedho to these more infectious strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the Field). This is how we are currently turning vaccinees into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious variants. [...] Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system. "Author: Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD (March 6, 2021) –

UK GOVT SOLUTIONS (except covid vaccines)

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-monoclonal-antibody-treatment-for-covid-19-approved-for-use-in-the-uk. Another novel expensive drug with no long term safety data rushed through the MHRA process whilst cheap effective and safe old medicines get ignored.

Ronapreve is a new medicine for prophylaxis and treatment of acute Covid-19 infection

Intravenous infusion:

Casirivimab and imdevimab must be administered together, after dilution, as a single intravenous (IV) infusion.

Subcutaneous administration:

Casirivimab and imdevimab must be administered consecutively by subcutaneous injection.

The dosage is 600 mg of casirivimab and 600 mg of imdevimab administered together either as a single IV infusion via pump or by subcutaneous injection.

Casirivimab and imdevimab should be given concurrently as soon as possible following exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-ronapreve/summary-of-product-characteristics-for-ronapreve    

 THE NUREMBERG CODE aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are: 

• Voluntary consent is essential
• The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society
• Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation
• Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury
• No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
• The risks should never exceed the benefits
• Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects
• Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists
• Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time
• The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur

The Charter of Patient Rights and Responsibilities from NHS SCOTLANDstipulates at page 13:"You have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test or screening procedure that is offered to you. - If you can understand the information you are given and are capable of making a decision for yourself about the care or treatment you are offered, then you have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test, or screening procedure, or to take part in research."
- Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine:
AN example of how academics justify mandatory vaccination as compatible with  human rights (ECHT) - Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*, Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220) - Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law(no mention to vaccination risks or the disputable ethic of the vaccine producing corporations - see  Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary - Ex:  AstraZeneca,  Sanofi,  Pfizer  )  

The cure of truth...
1) Hippocrates oath (-460 // 377): ′′ I will not give anyone poison, if asked, nor take the initiative of such a suggestion. ′′
2) Code of Medical Ethics, article 36:
Article R4127- 36 of the Public Health Code: ′′ The consent of the person examined or treated must be sought in all cases. When the patient, in a state of expressing his will, refuses the investigation or treatment proposed, the doctor must respect this refusal after informing the patient of his consequences ′′
3) Nuremberg Code (1947): ′′ The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment
4) Geneva statement for doctors (1948): ′′ I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient's health as my first concern ′′
5) Helsinki Declaration (1996) signed by 45 countries including France:
Article 25: ′′ The participation of persons capable of giving informed consent to medical research must be a voluntary act. No person capable of giving their informed consent can be involved in a search without giving their free and informed consent ′′
6) Oviedo Convention (1997) signed by 29 countries including France):
Article 5: ′′ An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the data subject has given free and informed consent. This person is given prior adequate information about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The data subject may, at any time, freely withdraw his consent ′′
7) Law Kouchner (March 4, 2002):
Article 111-4: ′′ Every person shall make decisions concerning his health with the healthcare professional and taking into account the information he provides him / her. The doctor must respect the will of the person after informing them of the consequences of their choices. If the person's willingness to refuse or discontinue treatment puts his or her life at risk, the doctor must do everything to convince him or her to accept the much needed care. No medical or treatment can be practiced without the free and informed consent of the person and this consent can be withdrawn at any time

 Salvetti stop (2002): No medical treatment is mandatory in the European Union: ′′ As a non-voluntary medical treatment, mandatory va><ination is an interference with the right to privacy, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ′′ (Salvetti v Italy-ECHR decision of 9 July 2002; No. 42197/98)
9) French Civil Code:
Article 16-1: ′′ Everyone has the right to respect their own bodies. The body is inviolable ′′
10) Council of Europe resolution 2361 (28 January 2021): advisory opinion: the Assembly urges member states and the European Union:
Article 731: ′′ To ensure that citizens are informed that va><ination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to get va><inated, if he or she does not wish to do so personally ′′
Article 732: ′′ To ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being va><inated, because of potential health risk or for not wanting to get va><inated

Professionals for Medical Informed Consent and Non-Discrimination (PROMIC) is an umbrella group for organisations of health professionals, scientists and lawyers established in August 2021.

The founding organisations of PROMIC are the Alliance for Natural Health International and the UK Medical Freedom Alliance.