GEOENGINEERING TRIGGERED CLIMATE CHANGE
HARP, CHEMTRAILS, AND WEATHER MODIFICATION – THE TRUE SOURCE OF CLIMATE CHAN
The whole article at https://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/02/18/haarp-chemtrails-weather-modification-true-source-climate-change/
2014 Article: "It is climate chaos, being greatly aided by the geo-engineering of weather by climate scientists attempting to cool down the Arctic up North to keep deadly methane gases from their accelerated releases from the newly exposed tundra. As Dane Wiggington of Geo-engineeringwatch.org has stated, “There is no normal weather anymore”. It is all manipulated through intense regular chemtrail spraying and HAARP technology to steer weather around the planet.
This is where the biggest game of all is being played out that is causing much of the global weather weirding we are all experiencing.
Though you will not hear about it on your corporate nightly news simply because there is zero benefit for corporations to inform us, there is a desperate all out attempt that is being conducted night and day, 24/7, to use chemtrail spraying and HAARP heat ray guns (see below) to re-cover the Arctic with snow and ice so that the massive amounts of methane gas pools that are now seeping out refreeze once again. For over one million years trapped methane gas has stayed frozen but now significant melting ice sheets has caused the tundra to become exposed in the Arctic with accompanying released pools of methane gas releases occurring in wider swaths of the Northernmost regions. [...]
In the atmosphere, methane is a greenhouse gas that, on a relatively short-term time scale, is far more destructive than carbon dioxide (CO2). It is 23 times as powerful as CO2 per molecule on a 100-year timescale, 105 times more potent when it comes to heating the planet on a 20-year timescale — and the Arctic permafrost, onshore and off, is packed with the stuff. “The seabed,” says Wadham, “is offshore permafrost, but is now warming and melting. We are now seeing great plumes of methane bubbling up in the Siberian Sea… millions of square miles where methane cover is being released.”
While the human body is potentially capable of handling a six to nine degree Celsius rise in the planetary temperature, the crops and habitat we use for food production are not. As scientist Guy McPherson of Nature Bats Last puts it, “If we see a 3.5 to 4C baseline increase, I see no way to have habitat. We are at .85C above baseline and we’ve already triggered all these self-reinforcing feedback loops.” [..]
So science and technology have decided they are going to solve this planetary problem by using massive amounts of chemtrail spraying and HAARP technologies in a desperate attempt to keep the remaining methane gases sealed or at least held in check.
The term the government scientists use to modify the weather with aircraft is “Solar Radiation Managing” (SRM). They now fear that if they stop the spraying we will immediately go to a hyper heated planet.
The Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that, despite global side effects and long-term consequences, geoengineering techniques involving solar radiation management (SRM) should be maintained:
“If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing.” (Source)
Solar radiation management comprises various techniques aimed at reflecting or diverting solar radiation back into space, essentially increasing the planet’s albedo (reflectivity). Solar radiation management has “three essential characteristics,” notes the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC), “It is cheap, fast and imperfect.” Citing geo-engineering activist, David Keith, the IRGC explains that by injecting 13,000 tons of sulphate aerosol into the stratosphere on a daily basis, they would offset the radiative effects of a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This compares to having to remove “225 million tons per day of CO2 from the atmosphere for 25 years.”
“Block the sun but continue to spew billions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,” is how Eli Kintisch characterizes SRM in his 2010 book, Hack the Planet. In a world run by sanity, we would forego fossil fuels for free and abundant solar energy, coupled with Tesla’s development of free electricity, to meet the world’s energy needs, without destroying our nest by extracting and burning fossil fuels.
Several bills have recently been introduced into Congress to legalize to modify the weather at will.
S. 517: Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2005 in it stated: “(1) interdisciplinary research and coordination of research and activities to improve understanding of processes relating to weather modification, including cloud modeling, cloud seeding, improving forecast and decision-making technologies, related severe weather research, and potential adverse affects of weather modification” (Source)
The geo-engineers are also using HAARP technology to steer winter weather coming in from the Pacific Oceans off California and attempting to steer the storms up into and above Alaska. Unfortunately they are only making things worse. A lot worse. The Arctic melting and methane gas releases continues. Alaska is recording continual record highs and the storms the geo-engineers are steering and seeding are re-Arctifying but down into and through the Midwest and Eastern half of the United States all the way into the South East."
--------------------------------------------------------
Recently, official admissions of the need of using geongineering in order to prevent the greenhouse gases accumulation in atmosphere:
and particularly the methane release due o arctic ice melting: This Climate Pioneer Is Trying To Stop The Arctic From Melting -
Dirk Elsthout, [29.08.21 15:26]
[Forwarded from Chemtrails Benelux, Stop 5G & Toxic air victims chat]
Arctic scientists are urgently proposing to mitigate methane by immediate deployment of mobile radio frequency transmitters to microwave the atmosphere with opposing frequencies. Microwaving methane addressed at American Meteorological Society conference in 2016. Microwaving the atmosphere to attempt degrading of methane has likely already been fully deployed long ago, and is furthering overall climate decimation.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/microwaving-the-atmosphere-to-mitigate-methane/ http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2015/10/lucy-alamo-projects-hydroxyl-generation-and-atmospheric-methane-destruction.html https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10156043715435161
Project Lucy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msreNyb1mYQ http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2012/10/radio-and-laser-frequency-and-harmonic-test-ranges-for-the-lucy-and-haarp-experiments-and-their-application-to-atmospheric-methane-destruction.html http://iowa-city-climate-advocates.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ProjectLucyExtendedVersion2.pdf
Alamo Project. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.280862375387125.1073741828.167911103348920 http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/decomposing-atmospheric-methane.html https://sites.google.com/site/runawayglobalwarming/the-non-disclosed-extreme-arctic-methane-threat
Dirk Elsthout (🇳🇱 NL), [30/05/2020 06:50]
Weather and hurricane modification with chaff metallized nylon fibres and carbon black dust since 1972 & report for US Senate in 1978 on chaff & smoke seeding (page 742 & 745). https://ceobs.org/from-enmod-to-geoengineering-the-environment-as-a-weapon-of-war/ http://www.chemring.co.uk/ https://www.military.com/defensetech/2006/02/08/air-force-aims-for-weather-control https://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00025909/00001/779j https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/5G.html https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milieumodificatieconventie https://t.me/smogrefugees/205?comment=5495b https://spectrum.ieee.org/lockheed-martin-5g
List of chaff patents for electronic warfare with aluminium chemtrails at all radar frequencies, including 5G microwaves :
1945, wave modifying reflector. 1963, re-entry chaff.
1967, camouflaging net including a resonance absorber for electromagnetic waves. 1971, propagation phenomena affecting satellite communication systems operating in the centimeter and millimeter wavelength bands. 1972, off-resonant chaff system for a large target viewed by low frequency radar. 1972, countermeasure system for laser radiation. 1977, scattering properties of Pruppacher‐and‐Pitter form raindrops and cross polarization due to rain: Calculations at 11, 13, 19.3, and 34.8 GHz.
1982, ram-air inflated, passive decoy for millimeter wave frequencies. 1982, synthetic dielectric material for broadband-selective absorption and reflection. 1984, overview of passive microwave snow research and results. 1987, a 94-GHz Doppler radar for cloud observations. 1989, metal-coated substrate articles responsive to electromagnetic radiation, and method of making and using the same. 1990, broadband passive moving target simulator. 1992, ellipsoidal chaff. 1994, compact, flexible and integrated millimeter wave radar sensor. 1999, integrated micro-strip antenna apparatus and a system utilizing the same for wireless communications for sensing and actuation purposes.
2001, anti-radar space-filling and/or multilevel chaff dispersers. 2002, electromagnetic radiation absorptive coating composition containing metal coated microspheres. 2002, design considerations for an harmonic radar to investigate the flight of insects at low altitude. 2005, identification tag. 2005-2009, smart chaff.
2006, multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices. 2008-2014, active chaff.
2008, portable low-power harmonic radar system and conformal tag for insect tracking. 2009, metamaterial dispersion.
2010, environmentally friendly chaff dipole, chaff manufactured using same, and chaff cartridge having a chaff loaded therein. 2010, generating radar cross-section signatures. 2011, retroreflecting chaff for laser defense. 2015, substrate lens antenna device. 2017, microwave radar based communication system photons antibody.
https://www.facebook.com/dirkelsthout/posts/10214783325518640?comment_id=10214784892037802&reply_comment_id=10214785139964000 https://t.me/chemtrails_group/16958
Dirk Elsthout (🇳🇱 NL), [30/05/2020 07:00]
Global arms race since 2000 for nano-weapons, such as small robotic machines, hyper-reactive explosives and electromagnetic super-materials.
Nanotechnology and Policy : Advances in nanotechnology are laying the foundations for developing molecular manufacturing systems, bringing a dramatic revolution in the price, performance, and ubiquity of smart products along with advances in medicine, computation, environmental improvements, and space exploration. Regulatory and intellectual property legal regimes will need to accommodate the coming technology. However, U.S. policy toward researching and funding nanotechnology is following an inconsistent model. Changes must be made in this approach to avoid falling behind other nations in the development and implementation of nanotechnology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology_in_warfare http://www.nanotech-now.com/columns/?article=173 https://www.jstor.org/stable/29762876?seq=1 https://slideplayer.com/slide/8638351/
http://www.crnano.org/us-policy.htm
Militarisation of space, internet & new physical principles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_physical_principles_weapons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militarisation_of_space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberwarfare
Nanoweapons for cures against cancer, or macro destruction and human extinction ? Sonication is the act of applying sound energy to agitate particles in a sample, for various purposes such as the extraction of multiple compounds from plants, microalgae and seaweeds. Ultrasonic frequencies (>20 kHz) are usually used, leading to the process also being known as ultrasonication. In the laboratory it is usually applied using an ultrasonic bath or probe.
http://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3028 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoshell#Cancer_treatment https://sociable.co/technology/nanoweapons-macro-destruction-what-can-future-bring/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonication https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_applications_of_nanotechnology#Military https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Nanoweapons https://www.huffpost.com/entry/are-nanoweapons-paving-the-road-to-human-extinction_b_59332a52e4b00573ab57a3fe https://www.technologyreview.com/2004/04/30/40204/nano-weapons-join-the-fight-against-cancer/
Scientists getting closer to smart dust brain implants that communicate via wireless network. Brain targeting by intranasal drug delivery (INDD) : A combined effect of trans-neural and para-neuronal pathway. In vivo polymerization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in the living rat hippocampus does not cause a significant loss of performance in a delayed alternation task. https://www.activistpost.com/2019/06/scientists-getting-closer-to-smart-dust-brain-implants-that-communicate-via-wireless-network.html https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24503720/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10717544.2014.923064 https://app.box.com/s/k4fm0btyufbmn0jck84ljplhezcj0tb
Turning the body into a wire : When the human body is the communications channel, it’s hard to hack the data.
Teslaphoresis and self-assembly of carbon nanotubes.
Carbon nanotubes found safe for reconnecting damaged neurons. https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/turning-the-body-into-a-wire https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.6b02313 https://www.kurzweilai.net/carbon-nanotubes-looking-good-for-repairing-damaged-neurons https://t.me/chemtrails_group/7146 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubiquitous_computing https://www.evolving-science.com/matter-energy-materials/teslaphoresis-and-self-assembly-carbon-nanotubes-00212 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartdust
Bill Gates funds Radiant Earth satellites to surveil the entire planet and mobile radars, offering solutions for unsuspected disasters in nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_Earth_Foundation https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5634953/Bill-Gates-backs-1-billion-plan-cover-Earth-Big-Brother-satellites.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/bill-gates-melinda-gates-gates-foundation-satellites-radiant-earth-project-seattle-a7642206.html https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/25/bill-gates-leads-kymetas-85-million-fundraising-for-satellite-antennas.html https://newspunch.com/bill-gates-satellite-planet/ https://www.radiant.earth/
Space-based geoengineering & lasers to mitigate global warming, microwaving the weather & evaporation suppressing monolayers on water. BAE Systems : Directed energy atmospheric heating plasma lens to revolutionise future battlefields.
https://weathermodificationhistory.com/tags/hurricane-modification/ https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/engineering/research/research-groups/materials-modelling-and-simulation/projects/theoretical-modelling-of-thin-film-permeability https://science.nasa.gov/ems/06_microwaves https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation_suppressing_monolayers https://www.vice.com/en/article/ae37w8/scientists-propose-using-lasers-to-fight-global-warming-from-space #4G5GHAARP
https://geoengineering.global/space-based-geoengineering/ http://www.baesystems.com/en-us/article/directed-energy-atmospheric-lens-could-revolutionise-future-battlefields https://climateviewer.com/tags/hurricane-modification/ https://t.me/chemtrails_group/6867 https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/29
Photo Gallery - presentation & scotland's skies 2019-2020
NANOPARTICLES _ AEROSOLS POLUTION
Additional Information
★ Stop chronic disease ★ Regulate ultrafine particles (UFP) ★ TELEGRAM
In urban regions such as the Netherlands, annual average background concentrations of 10,000 UFP/cm³ are measured since 2009. ±80% of UFP are non-bioaerosols spread over the country by exhaust of aviation, cars, ships, rockets, industrial plants, heaters, tobacco, etc, amounting in 5 million UFP inhaled with each human breath. South Korea claims that ±60% of its UFP comes from China, and urged for cooperation to reduce this toxic pollution.
Photo : Scanning electron microscope image of bundles of multiwalled carbon nanotubes piercing an air sac cell in the lungs.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Carbon_nanotubes_penetrating_lung_cell.tif/lossy-page1-1280px-Carbon_nanotubes_penetrating_lung_cell.tif.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particulates#Climate_effects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxicology_of_carbon_nanomaterials http://asianews.eu/content/china-south-korea-build-environment-cooperation-75620 https://t.me/smogrefugees/80 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySjpF7AO3KI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoscopic_scale https://t.me/chemtrails_group/15967
Dr Vyvyan Howard on nanoparticles toxicity of gasoline exhaust and catalytic converters in cars. https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/2349 https://t.me/smog_refugees_chat/480
Contrary to the behaviour of inhaled PM10 and PM2.5, UFPs are deposited in the lungs, where they have the ability to penetrate tissue and undergo interstitialization, or to be absorbed directly into the bloodstream, and therefore are not easily removed from the body and may have immediate effect. Exposure to UFPs, even if components are not very toxic, may cause oxidative stress, inflammatory mediator release, and could induce heart disease, lung disease, and other systemic effects. Nanoparticles present possible dangers, both medically and environmentally. Most of these are due to the high surface to volume ratio, which can make the particles very reactive or catalytic. They are also thought to aggregate on phospholipid bilayers and pass through cell membranes in organisms, and their interactions with biological systems are relatively unknown. Inhalation exposure is the most common route of exposure to airborne particles. Studies found that surface composition and electromagnetic charges on particles affect the degree of toxicity. There are many ways that size can affect the toxicity of a nanoparticle. For example, particles of different sizes can deposit in different places in the lungs, and are cleared from the lungs at different rates. Size can also affect the particles' reactivity and the specific mechanism by which they are toxic. Nanomaterials present in aerosol particles are often in an agglomerated or aggregated state, which affects their toxicological properties.
UFP risk assessment research is still in the very early stages. There are continuing debates about whether to regulate UFPs in the US and EU, and how to research and manage the health risks they may pose. As of 2008, the EPA does not yet regulate or research UFPs.
As of 2016, the EPA had conditionally registered, for a period of 4 years, only 2 nanomaterial pesticides as ingredients. The EPA differentiates nanoscale ingredients from non-nanoscale forms of the ingredient, but there is little scientific data about potential variation in toxicity. Testing protocols still need to be developed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrafine_particle#Regulation_and_legislation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotoxicology#Respiratory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-exhaust_emissions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalytic_converter http://www.epaalumni.org/hcp/pesticides.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaerosol
https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/2143 https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/2265 https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/3847 https://t.me/stop5gchemtrails/3940
